ragecon

newworldorphan:

wuhwuhwuhwuh:

this

I actually own this shirt

This is really funny because Dale is easily the craziest character on the show. He’s a conspiracy nut who believes that aliens abducted him and used his stolen sperm to impregnate his wife while he was out of town. Pretty much all of his lines are written to sound ridiculous and I have no idea why anyone would use him as a mascot.

whatthepuck87:

nym-winchester:

oyrishcreme:

sonicdoctors:

dead-end-generation:

So I got sent to the dean today for wearing this top. My study tech teacher said that I was “exploiting” myself and that it could be a distraction to the other students. I got up out of my seat and told her that I wasn’t going to listen to her dress codes. In a way, she was being misogynist and slut shaming and I think that’s wrong. I will continue to wear what I want and nobody can tell me not to. The fact that womens bodies are sexualized and objectified so much angers me and that’s the reason why this happened. I’m going to wear what I want, how I want, when I want and that’s it.

I was there, reblog the shit out of this guys

I’m a guy. I can’t wear a shirt like this either, even though I’m not going to be wearing a bra. it’s dress code. It’s not slut shaming. You can’t show your bra like that at most jobs. why should you at school? Yes sexism is wrong and all that, but you can’t get ‘angry at the patriarchy” because you can’t show your undergarments in public. I’m not going to wear jeans with a rip in the side  or the front that show off my flowery boxers, because that’s just not appropriate for school. Have some professionalism. You can wear whatever you like at home or with your friends or whatever, yes, but school prepares you for real life.

At work you can’t have this attitude of “I wear the fuck ever I want.” and expect to keep your job. School is the same way because it’s trying to teach you that lesson. That’s unrealistic; almost any job you get is going to have someone tell you what to wear or what to do because you work for them and you represent their company. If you don’t look the way they need you to look, that makes them look bad. A tattoo parlor probably isn’t going to hire someone who dresses like a nun and a top company isn’t going to hire someone who comes to work in a tank top that shows off her bra or a guy that shows off his ballsack. 

You can’t blame patriarchy for this, I’m sorry. You can’t blame sexism for this. If I wore booty shorts and you could almost see my balls through my semi transparent flowery goddamn boxers, I would get in the same amount of trouble as you, and it’s within good reason.

^

The guy who wrote that response is my new hero!!!! 

School teaches you how to do calculus, it doesn’t prepare you for real life. In an ideal world we’d learn how to do our taxes or set up a successful small business but that’s not the case. Your premise is wrong from the start. You also don’t know what sort of job this girl is going to end up in. There are tons of jobs where you can wear whatever you want. Hell, you can be your own boss. And you know what? At nearly every school in the US a guy can wear a shirt that exposes his armpits. It’s one thing to disagree with the ideas of feminism but you cannot possibly be ignorant enough to honestly believe that this is fair.

If you wore booty shorts and I could almost see your balls through your semi transparent flowery goddamn boxers, you would get in the same amount of trouble as someone who showed a small part of their bra strap meant to cover absolutely nothing. That strap is literally there just to keep the bra from falling off. You think that this is equal treatment and that there’s no sexism at work here?

(via mrspaulryan)

conservawhat:

ragingconservative07:

conservawhat:

ragingconservative07:

conservawhat:

ragingconservative07:

officialragecon:

lejacquelope:

officialragecon:

politically-incorrect-leftist:

It was never about protecting fetuses, was it conservafags? It was really about pushing your religion and controlling women.

Kids can’t receive welfare. Their parent(s) receive it FOR them. And it’s the parent(s) who decide how to spend it.

All unborn babies deserve the right to life. It’s even acknowledged in the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

CREATED equal. It doesn’t say BORN equal does it?

Get your head outta your ass and try harder.

But once they’re born, if they’re poor, then they can just starve. Gotcha.

Get YOUR head out of your ass.

Even Chinese people have less problems putting food on the table than Americans.

Maybe poor people shouldn’t be fucking and instead finding jobs before they start fucking. Just because you can fuck, doesn’t mean you should. You have a fucking brain, right? You know how to fucking use it, right? No. If you are poor and fucking and bringing kids into your poor world, you are a fucking idiot.

Whether or not you think poor people should be having sex is entirely irrelevant. Unless you plan on setting up some kind of bedroom police to make sure nobody’s having sex then there’s no way to stop them. While authoritarian ideas from the right don’t really surprise me I doubt even you would want to set up some Orwellian laws telling people who they can and can’t have sex with. If we can agree that these laws would be immoral then there’s no actual way to prevent poor people from doing the deed - people aren’t going to listen no matter how much you preach about abstinence on tumblr.  

This goes back to the original point, then: You don’t give a shit about poor people.  You don’t want to help them when they have the kids that are the inevitable result of sex without the proper education on birth control that you deny them.  You aren’t pro-life - you’re just anti-abortion.

You have absolutely no understanding of the conservative movement. Both parties want to solve all problems they just have different ways of doing it. Only certain people actually hate groups of people. However that is more common for liberals to do.

Nobody’s accusing you of being hateful. I’m accusing you to being either apathetic or oblivious to the needs of the poor.

It’s hard to properly study the effects of welfare as opposed to poverty due to the fact that the two issues are near inseparable but if you are truly pro-life then I imagine you would want children born in to poverty to have access to food, healthcare, shelter and education. Although we most likely don’t agree on how to decrease poverty, I’m sure that we both agree that that’s the end goal.  When you disagree with increasing access to birth control and abortion like some of our conservative friends here then you are increasing the amount of children born into this situation and perpetuating the cycle.

Using that theory, it would be okay to just kill all the poor people because then poverty would be extinguished.

No it wouldn’t. Preventing a potential birth is not the same as murdering conscious beings.

What changes from 10 minutes before birth to ten minutes after other than a childs environment. Science has proven you wrong. They are the same

10 minutes before birth the fetus is completely viable. That’s irrelevant.

conservawhat:

ragingconservative07:

conservawhat:

ragingconservative07:

officialragecon:

lejacquelope:

officialragecon:

politically-incorrect-leftist:

It was never about protecting fetuses, was it conservafags? It was really about pushing your religion and controlling women.

Kids can’t receive welfare. Their parent(s) receive it FOR them. And it’s the parent(s) who decide how to spend it.

All unborn babies deserve the right to life. It’s even acknowledged in the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

CREATED equal. It doesn’t say BORN equal does it?

Get your head outta your ass and try harder.

But once they’re born, if they’re poor, then they can just starve. Gotcha.

Get YOUR head out of your ass.

Even Chinese people have less problems putting food on the table than Americans.

Maybe poor people shouldn’t be fucking and instead finding jobs before they start fucking. Just because you can fuck, doesn’t mean you should. You have a fucking brain, right? You know how to fucking use it, right? No. If you are poor and fucking and bringing kids into your poor world, you are a fucking idiot.

Whether or not you think poor people should be having sex is entirely irrelevant. Unless you plan on setting up some kind of bedroom police to make sure nobody’s having sex then there’s no way to stop them. While authoritarian ideas from the right don’t really surprise me I doubt even you would want to set up some Orwellian laws telling people who they can and can’t have sex with. If we can agree that these laws would be immoral then there’s no actual way to prevent poor people from doing the deed - people aren’t going to listen no matter how much you preach about abstinence on tumblr.  

This goes back to the original point, then: You don’t give a shit about poor people.  You don’t want to help them when they have the kids that are the inevitable result of sex without the proper education on birth control that you deny them.  You aren’t pro-life - you’re just anti-abortion.

You have absolutely no understanding of the conservative movement. Both parties want to solve all problems they just have different ways of doing it. Only certain people actually hate groups of people. However that is more common for liberals to do.

Nobody’s accusing you of being hateful. I’m accusing you to being either apathetic or oblivious to the needs of the poor.

It’s hard to properly study the effects of welfare as opposed to poverty due to the fact that the two issues are near inseparable but if you are truly pro-life then I imagine you would want children born in to poverty to have access to food, healthcare, shelter and education. Although we most likely don’t agree on how to decrease poverty, I’m sure that we both agree that that’s the end goal.  When you disagree with increasing access to birth control and abortion like some of our conservative friends here then you are increasing the amount of children born into this situation and perpetuating the cycle.

Using that theory, it would be okay to just kill all the poor people because then poverty would be extinguished.

No it wouldn’t. Preventing a potential birth is not the same as murdering conscious beings.

conservawhat:

ragingconservative07:

officialragecon:

lejacquelope:

officialragecon:

politically-incorrect-leftist:

It was never about protecting fetuses, was it conservafags? It was really about pushing your religion and controlling women.

Kids can’t receive welfare. Their parent(s) receive it FOR them. And it’s the parent(s) who decide how to spend it.

All unborn babies deserve the right to life. It’s even acknowledged in the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

CREATED equal. It doesn’t say BORN equal does it?

Get your head outta your ass and try harder.

But once they’re born, if they’re poor, then they can just starve. Gotcha.

Get YOUR head out of your ass.

Even Chinese people have less problems putting food on the table than Americans.

Maybe poor people shouldn’t be fucking and instead finding jobs before they start fucking. Just because you can fuck, doesn’t mean you should. You have a fucking brain, right? You know how to fucking use it, right? No. If you are poor and fucking and bringing kids into your poor world, you are a fucking idiot.

Whether or not you think poor people should be having sex is entirely irrelevant. Unless you plan on setting up some kind of bedroom police to make sure nobody’s having sex then there’s no way to stop them. While authoritarian ideas from the right don’t really surprise me I doubt even you would want to set up some Orwellian laws telling people who they can and can’t have sex with. If we can agree that these laws would be immoral then there’s no actual way to prevent poor people from doing the deed - people aren’t going to listen no matter how much you preach about abstinence on tumblr.  

This goes back to the original point, then: You don’t give a shit about poor people.  You don’t want to help them when they have the kids that are the inevitable result of sex without the proper education on birth control that you deny them.  You aren’t pro-life - you’re just anti-abortion.

You have absolutely no understanding of the conservative movement. Both parties want to solve all problems they just have different ways of doing it. Only certain people actually hate groups of people. However that is more common for liberals to do.

Nobody’s accusing you of being hateful. I’m accusing you to being either apathetic or oblivious to the needs of the poor.

It’s hard to properly study the effects of welfare as opposed to poverty due to the fact that the two issues are near inseparable but if you are truly pro-life then I imagine you would want children born in to poverty to have access to food, healthcare, shelter and education. Although we most likely don’t agree on how to decrease poverty, I’m sure that we both agree that that’s the end goal.  When you disagree with increasing access to birth control and abortion like some of our conservative friends here then you are increasing the amount of children born into this situation and perpetuating the cycle.

officialragecon:

lejacquelope:

officialragecon:

politically-incorrect-leftist:

It was never about protecting fetuses, was it conservafags? It was really about pushing your religion and controlling women.

Kids can’t receive welfare. Their parent(s) receive it FOR them. And it’s the parent(s) who decide how to spend it.

All unborn babies deserve the right to life. It’s even acknowledged in the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

CREATED equal. It doesn’t say BORN equal does it?

Get your head outta your ass and try harder.

But once they’re born, if they’re poor, then they can just starve. Gotcha.

Get YOUR head out of your ass.

Even Chinese people have less problems putting food on the table than Americans.

Maybe poor people shouldn’t be fucking and instead finding jobs before they start fucking. Just because you can fuck, doesn’t mean you should. You have a fucking brain, right? You know how to fucking use it, right? No. If you are poor and fucking and bringing kids into your poor world, you are a fucking idiot.

Whether or not you think poor people should be having sex is entirely irrelevant. Unless you plan on setting up some kind of bedroom police to make sure nobody’s having sex then there’s no way to stop them. While authoritarian ideas from the right don’t really surprise me I doubt even you would want to set up some Orwellian laws telling people who they can and can’t have sex with. If we can agree that these laws would be immoral then there’s no actual way to prevent poor people from doing the deed - people aren’t going to listen no matter how much you preach about abstinence on tumblr.  

This goes back to the original point, then: You don’t give a shit about poor people.  You don’t want to help them when they have the kids that are the inevitable result of sex without the proper education on birth control that you deny them.  You aren’t pro-life - you’re just anti-abortion.

(via officialragecon-deactivated2013)